← Search

Rachael Yelverton

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 115W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachael Yelverton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Ti.Barrier40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Durland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Ti.Barrier18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elisabeth Van Order
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · Ti.Barrier40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Ti.Barrier18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Whitney Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Ti.Barrier40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Durland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · Me.DeLorme18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hugh Cronin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Me.DeLorme18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Yelverton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · Ti.Barrier40T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Barrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Stacey Schulhofer / Jennie West
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Brette Best championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Brette Best championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Heather Crysler / Kristen Oliver
2026-06-19 · #4 Doubles · with Lowry Liggon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Brette Best championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 71.5% of games
4.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 56% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
72%
18W–7L · 59% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova