← Search

Elizabeth Newton

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 59W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Newton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Ti.Barrier40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachael Yelverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · Ti.Barrier18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Ti.Barrier40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Koltchagova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · Ti.Barrier40T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Ti.Barrier40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donnarie Hales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Ti.Barrier40T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Ti.Barrier40T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · Ti.Barrier40T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Cutts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-21 · La.Brown18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Pisciotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-12 · Ti.Barrier40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Koltchagova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-28 · Ti.Barrier40A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · La.Brown18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.2%
36W–21L · 55.7% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.6% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal