← Search

Dana Rawls

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 129W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Rawls to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-09-02 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Ja.Martin18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Lisa Scott / Sandra Rhoades
2026-08-19 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Killian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · Ja.Martin18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Mazurak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Ja.Martin18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Fye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison DeMacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Holder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John van Campen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison DeMacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · To.Sutler18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison DeMacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61%
25W–16L · 54.8% of games
4.0
41.2%
28W–40L · 46.7% of games
7.5
56.8%
46W–35L · 53.3% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 54.3% of games
4.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
64 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal