← Search

Elisabeth Van Order

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 78W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elisabeth Van Order to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Ti.Barrier18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Barrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · Ti.Barrier18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachael Yelverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Neville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-11 · Ti.Barrier18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Ti.Barrier18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donnarie Hales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · De.Turner40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim von Weihe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Elizabeth Taylor / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
2026-07-12 · Ti.Barrier40T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donnarie Hales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-30 · Ma.Gonella18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Zimardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-18 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Ti.Barrier40T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Ma.Gonella18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Monsees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
62.2%
51W–31L · 55.1% of games
6.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 57% of games
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
21%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova