← Search

Emily Bambini

Canton, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 22W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Bambini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-08-04 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chih Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Lammers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Lammers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wellington Chu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · HV-Bauer LOW TRI WOMEN F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wellington Chu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · HV-Wang 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #1 Singles · 8.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-5
L
2026-02-22 · HV-Bauer LOW TRI WOMEN F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · HV-Wang 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #1 Singles · 8.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 39.2% of games
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#1 Singles
31%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert