← Search

Deanna Pilling

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 29W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deanna Pilling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-03-18 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-19 · SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-12 · SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelli Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-08 · SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-05-01 · SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelli Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-02 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4
L
2025-02-04 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-25 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tempe Zucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-11 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Eichenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-21 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2023-06-13 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tempe Zucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-05-01 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Capelin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
44.8%
26W–32L · 48.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert