← Search

Linda Eichenbaum

— year-end
179 matches · 85W–94L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Linda Eichenbaum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
L
2024-11-17 · Eichenbaum/Tegtmeyer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Capelin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-21 · Eichenbaum/Tegtmeyer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Capelin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-08-19 · Bliss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margo Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
L
2024-07-18 · Bliss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
L
2024-07-15 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Berry Ravitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-06-18 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Berry Ravitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-3
L
2024-06-14 · Huntington, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-11 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna Pilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-09 · Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Plotnick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-09 · Huntington, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-07 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-01 · Eichenbaum/Hyams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-6
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.6% of games
4.0
56.1%
55W–43L · 51.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
30.4%
14W–32L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer