← Search

Dee Kelleher

Massillon, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 94W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dee Kelleher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W NC1 Bullach · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Fehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W NC McHolm · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Deluca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Rachel Brahler / Angela Smith
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W NC Kelleher · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Tortorella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W NC1 Bullach · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · A55 7.0W D NC1 Kelley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · A55 7.0W D NC1 Kelley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W NC1 Bullach · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · A55 7.0W D NC1 Kelley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Altman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W NC Kelleher · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jing Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · A40 4.0W NC McHolm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · A40 4.0W NC McHolm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · A40 4.0W NC McHolm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Torie Utterback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
67.6%
25W–12L · 57% of games
3.5
48.1%
37W–40L · 50.6% of games
4.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 38.1% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.8% of games
6.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 42.9% of games
7.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
16 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert