← Search

Lori Caldwell

— year-end
48 matches · 22W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lori Caldwell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Sundermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Kemmerer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caren Wasta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-04 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Harder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Harder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirby Dreher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirby Dreher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-12-12 · Hurn/Sherman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Thinnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-07-22 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-08 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Kemmerer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 50.5% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.8% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 29% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer