← Search

Lisa Yoder

— year-end
122 matches · 72W–50L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Lisa Yoder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2024-10-20 · CIN A40 4.5W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-29 · CIN A40 4.5W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thetchen Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-09-22 · CIN A40 4.5W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Gavitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Puckett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Shellee Starks / Ana Maria Vega
2024-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colleen ONeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Renee Noe / Becky Ragsdale
2024-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linda Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-15 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.5 W, Bundy (GCHS) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lorrie Pavlack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-01 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.5 W, Bundy (GCHS) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thetchen Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lynn Ducat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Anne Luke / Becky Ragsdale
2024-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colleen ONeal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams4 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
71.7%
38W–15L · 58.3% of games
4.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 44.9% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.3% of games
8.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.7% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.8% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King