← Search

Debra Wilkinson

— year-end
60 matches · 19W–41L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Debra Wilkinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2023-07-19 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-17 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Grisez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-06-30 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue van Etten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-07 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-06-02 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Grisez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-24 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Bortz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-07-22 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Jefferies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-07-21 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-30 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jing Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2022-06-29 · A40 3.0W NC Peters · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Ann Cecchini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-23 · A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Linda Barker / Denise Brown
2022-06-22 · A40 3.0W NC Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
Teams8 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.5% of games
6.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 41.9% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal