← Search

Dana Viglietta

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 60W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Viglietta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Boban Mihajlov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
Hannah Malec
2026-05-10 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Sibert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Prewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-29 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Cirman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Jodi Rhodes / Michelle Wright
2026-03-15 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Hilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Kjerrumgaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Elizabeth Long / Terri Graham
2026-02-01 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Scarborough · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-14 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
57.9%
55W–40L · 53.2% of games
4.0
13.9%
5W–31L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
12%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams