← Search

Katherine Cain

— year-end
250 matches · 145W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Cain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
L
2026-06-11 · Scioto CC 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Stieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Lhota
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
Lori Brown / Chika Tanaka
2026-04-27 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Rave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikelle Copella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Britt Straka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-03 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Rave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-30 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Freytag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-6
L
2026-03-29 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Wofford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-09 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Wofford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Pamela Miller / Christina Kulesa
2025-12-19 · Racquet Club 5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabina Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 49.8% of games
3.0
58.3%
49W–35L · 54.4% of games
3.5
51.3%
40W–38L · 49.9% of games
5.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 65.4% of games
6.5
75%
24W–8L · 61.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
69 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams