← Search

Beth Zubowicz

Aurora, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 110W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Zubowicz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · HG RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Renick-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-05 · HRCA-S RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Ponciano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · HRCA-S RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · HRCA-S RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Millet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-02 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-08-26 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-08-19 · LTFC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Kaori Dowling championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-12 · LTFC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie DeVilliers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-31 · HG PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn Blackwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-29 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-24 · HG PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Greenfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
88.7%
47W–6L · 63.3% of games
4.0
30.6%
22W–50L · 43.8% of games
7.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 58.9% of games
8.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer