← Search

Stacey Branch

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 20W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stacey Branch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-08-28 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jena Dupont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-26 · CACM PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Abalos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-21 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · CACM PINK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dustin du Pont mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Corbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Fuentes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Fuentes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-28 · CACM PINK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
36.2%
17W–30L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert