← Search

Catherine Corbett

Englewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 99W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Corbett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-07-26 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · SS-LGT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Roesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · SS-LGT GREEN · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Branch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · SS-LGT GREEN · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Anselmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-10 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-16 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-13 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-09 · SS-H ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Inge Bentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
75.4%
46W–15L · 61.4% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 55.4% of games
9.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.5% of games
8.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.6% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams