← Search

Lauren Bolger

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 94W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lauren Bolger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-09-03 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Terri Tarrant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristin Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-09-29 · Ch.Higgins18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Zerkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2024-09-08 · Ch.Higgins18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Zerkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Christie Hartinger / Megan Bennett
2024-08-11 · Ch.Higgins18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-03 · 1-LBolger-Eno · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim El
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-09-28 · 1-LBolger-Eno · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Burkert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-09-10 · TOC.Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charlie Trinco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-09-07 · 1-LBolger-Eno · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Ventura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-08-20 · TOC.Higgins · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meghan Zerkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2023-08-17 · 1-LBolger-Eno · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim El
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Heald / Daniel Branston
2023-07-17 · 2-LBolger-Eno · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Perdue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 59.7% of games
4.0
34.6%
18W–34L · 47.9% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.6% of games
7.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.4% of games
8.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 72.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Singles
13%
22 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert