← Search

Patricia Travers

— year-end
71 matches · 23W–48L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Patricia Travers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2025-07-15 · Surick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Pillay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-01 · Surick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Pillay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-06-24 · Surick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Pillay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-17 · Surick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · Team Rozar/Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Pillay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-25 · Team Rozar/Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Cawood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-06-18 · Team Rozar/Park · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-07 · Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Desalvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Lisa Zampella / Jennifer Schipper
2023-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-06-05 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-12-04 · Corona Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Desalvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-11-20 · Corona Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
25%
12W–36L · 42.9% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King