← Search

John Flagg

— year-end
140 matches · 72W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Flagg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Be.Barnhill40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Soltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · Wi.Turner55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Cockrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-24 · Wi.Turner55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-03 · Wi.Turner55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christof Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-13 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-10-01 · Be.Barnhill40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-09-24 · Be.Barnhill40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Camilo Pena / Marc Best
2025-09-03 · Be.Barnhill40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-31 · Ch.Evans55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-27 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-29 · Ra.Louzao55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Woodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-04-24 · Br.Lamm40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.5%
54W–31L · 54.5% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 41.1% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
11%
16 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams