← Search

Derek Meares

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 68W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Derek Meares to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-09-02 · De.Meares40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Sage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-30 · De.Meares18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-05 · De.Meares40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-08-02 · De.Meares18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Les Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Les Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Steinhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Steinhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Baur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · De.Meares18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Troch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-18 · De.Meares40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Les Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.1% of games
3.5
30%
36W–84L · 41.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 48.1% of games
7.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal