← Search

Sharling Grummon

— year-end
52 matches · 22W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sharling Grummon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephanie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · Green/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-02 · Brooks/Ramthun/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-30 · Robinson/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-25 · Ranero/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-23 · Robinson/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-04 · Ranero/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-09-08 · PM Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Palina Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-08-18 · PM Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Cesarone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Allyson Edwards / Jennifer Rogers
2025-08-11 · PM Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brandy Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams52 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 43.1% of games
8.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.4% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal