← Search

Debra Hutjens

Franklin, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 30W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Debra Hutjens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
Katie Feyes / Sarah Green
2026-09-13 · Williams/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chantel Wujtow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · Brown/Cesarone/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Brende
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Brown/Cesarone/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · Williams/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Blalock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-5
L
2026-08-05 · Brown/Cesarone/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Gaia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Taylor Shelton / Shannon Smith
2026-08-05 · Williams/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hollie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Gillian Stewart / Walt Boling
2026-07-26 · McDonald/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicolas Tempels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cesarone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-15 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cesarone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · McDonald/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
Josh Gregory / Alise Gregory
2026-06-07 · McDonald/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicolas Tempels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Brown/Andrews/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 60.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.3% of games
4.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Singles
15%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova