← Search

Jill Jensen Clark

Sandy, UT
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 28W–23L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Jill Jensen Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
Amanda Chen / Aida Tracy
2023-09-16 · #3 Doubles · with Leslie Barrowes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-26 · Liberty Park Tennis-Picou · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-06-12 · Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrice Duvernay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-06-12 · Liberty Park Tennis-Picou · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Tonin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Afton Staheli Balderree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-10 · Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrice Duvernay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Garland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Afton Staheli Balderree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Garland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.5% of games
4.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 48% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe