← Search

Sarah Kopp

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 45W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Kopp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-23 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zachary Hustad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Sandusky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Cohen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · CACM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Kitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Sloane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Kitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
42.9%
33W–44L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
30.3%
10W–23L · 43.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova