← Search

Debra Haller

LITTLETON, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 15W–31L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Debra Haller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2024-06-13 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-06 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-16 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-05-09 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Achterberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-09 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Haberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-09 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathalia Faribault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-06-02 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Achterberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2022-08-08 · LTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vera Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
L
2022-08-01 · LTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vera Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2022-07-25 · LTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Sexton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-07-19 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Greiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-07-05 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elsa Zimmerer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
18.5%
5W–22L · 35.6% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 44.7% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe