← Search

Anne Fairey

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anne Fairey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
Margaret Johnson / Caroline Graves
2026-06-16 · Rowe/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Heflin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · Fairey/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · Fairey/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Fairey/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · Reddoch/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Palmer Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-09 · Fairey/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · Fairey/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Fairey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-19 · Fairey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-13 · Reddoch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-11-04 · Reddoch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Reddoch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-09-17 · Garrott/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 48.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Singles
18%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Singles
15%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams