← Search

Jennifer Carstensen

Germantown, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 71W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Carstensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Magee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Green / Morgan Burton
2026-08-16 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Magee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Neal/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Brackett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Sophie Edwards / Chris Wood
2026-07-11 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Franks/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kuenzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · Hayes/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-06 · Hayes/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriela Harsanyi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · Lacy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Wenzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
82.2%
37W–8L · 62.9% of games
4.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 45.1% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.8% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe