← Search

David Baddour

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 125W–97L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Baddour to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
L
2026-09-10 · DBaddour.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robert Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-09 · DBaddour.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christian Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-13 · DBaddour.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kenneth Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · RHutchins.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-09 · Ch.Wasko18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Hollingsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Kim · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carey Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Le.Ji18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-30 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · TOC.Kim · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carey Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-22 · VAurentz-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niels Lameijer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Le.Ji18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Shelby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
67%
67W–33L · 57.6% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.9% of games
7.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.1% of games
8.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 47% of games
4.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
54.1%
20W–17L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert