← Search

Jason McFarley

Lincoln, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 35W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason McFarley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-06-18 · McFarley/Lubben · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rian Beyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · McFarley/Lubben · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · McFarley/Lubben · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rian Beyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · McFarley/Lubben · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-24 · LI/Dean/Mid-TriM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Santiago Murtagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-10 · LI/Dean/Mid-TriM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kreg Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-08-19 · LI/Dean/Mid-TriM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jackson Schwanebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-26 · McFarley/Lubben · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Lubben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-06-16 · Green · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Santiago Murtagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-09 · Green · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Schwanebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-02 · Green · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Karrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-29 · McFarley/Lubben · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rian Beyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.5% of games
4.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 49.7% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal