← Search

Joan Gurson

Coraopolis, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 51W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joan Gurson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Mellon Bubble 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Durst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · Brady Bunch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Virginia Molitor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Mellon Bubble 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-18 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · Mellon Bubble 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nalepa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-5, 0-1
W
2025-11-14 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nalepa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-19 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Nalepa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-3
L
2025-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Dinucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hanadi Abdul-Aal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 47.4% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 60.1% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 40.5% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 60.8% of games
8.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#1 Singles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova