← Search

Caitlin Day Wedel

Lawrence, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 37W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Day Wedel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-02-01 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacque Griffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2025-06-17 · Prasad, Pritha · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with MacY Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-20 · Prasad, Pritha · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Miles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-22 · Prasad, Pritha · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Miles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-17 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emma Sanoja
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-03 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer VanMeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
L
2024-10-27 · Griffey, Jacque · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karanne Balderston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-15 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Taber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-21 · Prasad, Pritha · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carolyn Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-24 · Griffey, Jacque · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Eastwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-11 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ingrid Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-01-21 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer VanMeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.5
41.6%
32W–45L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer