← Search

Brandie Sparr

Lexington Park, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 104W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brandie Sparr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Tami Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marissa Romanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Tami Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Leimbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marissa Romanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Leimbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Tami Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · Tami Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Party at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · Party at the Net · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Party at the Net · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Noronha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
50%
8W–8L · 48.8% of games
4.0
60.4%
29W–19L · 51.7% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 55.9% of games
7.5
40%
12W–18L · 45.3% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 53.5% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 63.5% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.5% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
53 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer