← Search

Helen Patterson

Annapolis, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 65W–68L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Helen Patterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Tami Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandie Sparr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · Tami Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalita Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Tami Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Caddeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-23 · Tami Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Noronha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Caddeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Caddeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Ball Strikers 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Martin 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Christopher Johnson / Masako Murphy
2026-07-14 · Ball Strikers 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Lavinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalita Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Martin 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalita Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · Sweeney/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Gunhus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.4% of games
4.0
43.3%
29W–38L · 47% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.4% of games
8.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams