← Search

Lisa Walsh

— year-end
198 matches · 92W–106L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lisa Walsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Orebaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-27 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Laabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Orebaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Laabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Coady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6
L
2026-07-27 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy LaMoure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · Chung - The Rackettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Kendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Ahmad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Chung - The Rackettes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Kendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Rohm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 52.3% of games
3.5
54.6%
53W–44L · 54.1% of games
4.0
30.9%
17W–38L · 42.7% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe