← Search

Tia Briscoe

Waldorf, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
423 matches · 290W–133L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Tia Briscoe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history423 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Phung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nhi Phung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-29 · Lady Strikers Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Mackowiak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-1
L
2026-08-24 · Lady Strikers Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · Phung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bynum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-07 · Ifill - Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Astle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Ifill - Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Brizan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · Lob & Order: Special Tennis Unit 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Brizan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 68.1% of games
3.5
75%
120W–40L · 59.1% of games
4.0
47.3%
26W–29L · 47.2% of games
6.5
85%
17W–3L · 68% of games
7.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.5% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 85.7% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.6%
38W–28L · 54.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
167 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
141 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
87 matches
#1 Singles
5%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams