← Search

Cheryl Stevens

Pittsboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 54W–49L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Stevens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-08-14 · CMills-UNC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Kyle Gouchoe-Hanas / Amy Johnston
2026-07-13 · RBonello-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Beckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · RBonello-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joelle Permutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · RBonello-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah DeVore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-19 · RBonello-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · LKieffer-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Muzyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-27 · CMills-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Cantrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · LKieffer-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Yeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-21 · LFarber-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Spinarski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hana Mastro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · CMills-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Yeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
52.2%
35W–32L · 51.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.2% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert