← Search

Sarah DeVore

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 66W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah DeVore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-20 · CAvery.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth McNamara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerald Farren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jeanne Beckley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · RBonello-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Destiny Lopez / Brett Tracy
2026-06-30 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivam Panthri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerald Farren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sathyan Guru mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · RBonello-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-02 · MLong.3.5-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chance Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · RDavis-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · RDavis-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-20 · LBaxter-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 62.5% of games
3.5
43.3%
26W–34L · 46.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 50.7% of games
6.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 59.6% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 44.1% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert