← Search

Nancy Alterman

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 30W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Alterman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-05 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Feiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · DTC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · DTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jann Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · DTC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Wulliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-03 · DTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Glazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · DTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · DTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.2% of games
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 44.5% of games
7.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 48% of games
8.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 32.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
22%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova