← Search

Bobbie Turner

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 70W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bobbie Turner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Jensik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Jensik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kris Staaf-Bendixen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · CACM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Sandusky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Staaf-Bendixen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · CACM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · CACM TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Staaf-Bendixen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.7%
23W–7L · 60.3% of games
3.5
40.7%
35W–51L · 45.2% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
21%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert