← Search

Debra St John

Parker, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 91W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra St John to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-07-28 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · SS-LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carole Dagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Debartolomeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · SS-LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Georgina Swales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · SS-LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Georgina Swales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · PRC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth McNamee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · PRC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Liestman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · PRC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Debartolomeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · PRC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Flecky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-09 · PRC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Debartolomeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 62% of games
3.5
43.4%
46W–60L · 47.1% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
48.6%
17W–18L · 47.2% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe