← Search

Megan Kovacs

— year-end
70 matches · 22W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan Kovacs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-03-22 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-11 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-25 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Borghi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-11 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Borghi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-02-01 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Haffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · Steinhart/Borghi (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-12-17 · Borghi/Steinhart (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Walden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · Borghi/Steinhart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-08 · Borghi/Steinhart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-4
W
2025-04-02 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Hoxsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-02-19 · Borghi/Steinhart (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ganschaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-0
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40.9%
18W–26L · 47.3% of games
4.0
14.3%
3W–18L · 42.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal