← Search

Christine Wiegand

Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 9W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Christine Wiegand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Miksich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Miksich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Miksich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · M. Johnson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jack Dombrowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-21 · M. Johnson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Noel Hoig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · M. Johnson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brendan Eglseder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Chris Foster / Donna Wyse
2026-04-24 · Betts · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ron Betts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Mendlick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · Betts · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Noel Hoig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · Bourland · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Miksich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · Bourland · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Miksich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 50.5% of games
9.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal