← Search

Lindsay Clayton

— year-end
99 matches · 59W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lindsay Clayton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Da Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Da Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Da Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · NEWC/Gradoville/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Bourland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · NEWC/Gradoville/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andria Louis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · NEWC/Gradoville/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Gradoville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Bourland · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anastasia Kyvelidou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ezequiel Piccione mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · Bourland · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Christopher Freeman / Julie Obear
2026-03-06 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gabriel Pariacote mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.5% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games
4.5
33.3%
9W–18L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 64.7% of games
8.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 60% of games
9.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer