← Search

Kathy Crowder

— year-end
44 matches · 23W–21L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Kathy Crowder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2025-10-05 · Tomlinson-NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Missie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
PENNY WILKINS / Barbara Wilson
2025-09-17 · Mendoza/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shannon Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-09-10 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Schneiderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-03 · Mendoza/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Patrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-08-27 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cristi Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-08-18 · Tomlinson NC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kacy Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-08-17 · Mendoza/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Patrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-09 · Picha/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cristi Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-27 · Tomlinson NC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sandy Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · Tomlinson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kecia Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-10 · Tomlinson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kecia Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-03 · Tomlinson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kecia Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.3% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.5% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.5% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova