← Search

PENNY WILKINS

— year-end
30 matches · 17W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add PENNY WILKINS to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Kinney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Halliburton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-30 · Kinney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marielba Briceno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Kendall/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Kendall/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Barbara Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · Kinney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janet Grillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Kendall/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Linebarger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Kendall/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Bondurant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Kendall/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Bondurant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · Wehmeyer/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Wehmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-09 · Wehmeyer/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Savannah Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · Wehmeyer/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Noldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-26 · Wehmeyer/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.6% of games
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 49.1% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer