← Search

Nancy Rose

— year-end
87 matches · 55W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nancy Rose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charissa Derieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Eddy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Mencke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Kendall/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Melony Bratton / Stephanie Wright
2026-08-23 · Eddy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Colleen Wilson / Molly Smith
2026-08-16 · Kendall/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Wendy Spas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · Kendall/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Terry Bondurant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meredith Drumwright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Eddy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Stolnicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charissa Derieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marielba Briceno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marielba Briceno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Nair/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Letitia Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams41 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 61.9% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 34.1% of games
5.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.5% of games
6.5
55%
11W–9L · 49.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert