← Search

Meghan Salaga

— year-end
78 matches · 42W–36L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Meghan Salaga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Lanza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-12-14 · Wisehaven 1 - A Stich In Time · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Lanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Audrey Lubas / Tammy Miller
2025-10-19 · Wisehaven 1 - A Stich In Time · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darlene Ashwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-01 · Wisehaven - Baby Got Backhand (Myers) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kamdyn Balko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · with Hunter Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-03-29 · Wisehaven - L. O. B. · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hunter Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-03-02 · Wisehaven - Myers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kamala Kannan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-09 · Wisehaven - L. O. B. · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hunter Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kamdyn Balko championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Deanna Volk / Sandra McCafferty
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Lanza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-01-24 · #1 Doubles · with Bonnie Fissella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-17 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Polmanteer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.1% of games
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.6% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#2 Singles
10%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer