← Search

Courtney Gianola

Hattiesburg, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 38W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Courtney Gianola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Rodgers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Mayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-03 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Mayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Mayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terence Payne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-8
W
2026-07-19 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terence Payne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
9-7
W
2026-07-13 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Mayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jackson Stanford / Carly Wise
2026-06-22 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Bishop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · Black · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · Black · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Shemper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-28 · Black-HRC-40’s-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.8% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 84.5% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.1% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53% of games
4.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams