← Search

Sung Kang

Richmond, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 202W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sung Kang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history287 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Evko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Evko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erich Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · ACAC Voigt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Voigt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Evko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · Belmont Stephens 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erich Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · ACAC Voigt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Bader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · ACAC Hatcher · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · ACAC Voigt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Neuwelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · ACAC Hatcher · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · ACAC Voigt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Voigt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
64.7%
75W–41L · 54.4% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.7% of games
8.0
76%
19W–6L · 58.9% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.9% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.8% of games
7.5mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
90.3%
56W–6L · 60.4% of games
8.5mixed
50%
10W–10L · 49.6% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
66 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer