← Search

Amy Lundy

Westport, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 28W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Lundy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-03-18 · INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-11 · INT:Honeydeuces:Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-23 · INT:Honeydeuces:Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Wolff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-01-16 · INT:Honeydeuces:Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Ringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-11 · INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Lehrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-14 · INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliya Arbisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-25 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-10-15 · INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliya Arbisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-03-05 · INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly/Sellschop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliya Arbisman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-23 · KH:Blazing Queens:Danchak · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.3%
24W–29L · 45.5% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova